↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Lung microbiology and exacerbations in COPD

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Lung microbiology and exacerbations in COPD
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2012
DOI 10.2147/copd.s28286
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Beasley, Priya V Joshi, Aran Singanayagam, Philip L Molyneaux, Sebastian L Johnston, Patrick Mallia

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the most common chronic respiratory condition in adults and is characterized by progressive airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. The main etiological agents linked with COPD are cigarette smoking and biomass exposure but respiratory infection is believed to play a major role in the pathogenesis of both stable COPD and in acute exacerbations. Acute exacerbations are associated with more rapid decline in lung function and impaired quality of life and are the major causes of morbidity and mortality in COPD. Preventing exacerbations is a major therapeutic goal but currently available treatments for exacerbations are not very effective. Historically, bacteria were considered the main infective cause of exacerbations but with the development of new diagnostic techniques, respiratory viruses are also frequently detected in COPD exacerbations. This article aims to provide a state-of-the art review of current knowledge regarding the role of infection in COPD, highlight the areas of ongoing debate and controversy, and outline emerging technologies and therapies that will influence future diagnostic and therapeutic pathways in COPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 212 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 19%
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 35 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 45 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,257,968
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#373
of 2,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,327
of 179,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.