↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A comparison of the NEIVFQ25 and GQL-15 questionnaires in Nigerian glaucoma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of the NEIVFQ25 and GQL-15 questionnaires in Nigerian glaucoma patients
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2012
DOI 10.2147/opth.s33592
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chigozie A Mbadugha, Adeola O Onakoya, Olufisayo T Aribaba, Folashade B Akinsola

Abstract

To compare two vision-specific quality of life (QOL) instruments - the disease-specific 15-item Glaucoma Quality of Life questionnaire (GQL-15) and the nonglaucoma-specific 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEIVFQ25).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 24 28%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Psychology 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 28 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2012.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,551
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,520
of 188,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#16
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.