↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Lipid nanoparticles for targeted siRNA delivery – going from bench to bedside

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
Title
Lipid nanoparticles for targeted siRNA delivery – going from bench to bedside
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s106625
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timofei S Zatsepin, Yuri V Kotelevtsev, Victor Koteliansky

Abstract

This review covers the basic aspects of small interfering RNA delivery by lipid nano-particles (LNPs) and elaborates on the current status of clinical trials for these systems. We briefly describe the roles of all LNP components and possible strategies for their improvement. We also focus on the current clinical trials using LNP-formulated RNA and the possible outcomes for therapy in the near future. Also, we present a critical analysis of selected clinical trials that reveals the common logic behind target selection. We address this review to a wide audience, especially to medical doctors who are interested in the application of RNA interference-based treatment platforms. We anticipate that this review may spark interest in this particular audience and generate new ideas in target selection for the disorders they are dealing with.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 265 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 18%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Other 10 4%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 72 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 39 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 10%
Chemistry 23 9%
Engineering 14 5%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 76 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,589,736
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#228
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,484
of 367,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#10
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.