↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: efficacy and safety

Overview of attention for article published in Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: efficacy and safety
Published in
Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease, September 2012
DOI 10.2147/dnnd.s25750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nader Pouratian, Sandeep Thakkar, Won Kim, Jeff M Bronstein

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery has become increasingly utilized in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. Over the past decade, a number of studies have demonstrated that DBS is superior to best medical management in appropriately selected patients. The primary targets for DBS in Parkinson's disease include the subthalamic nucleus and the internal segment of the globus pallidus, both of which improve the cardinal motor features in Parkinson's disease. Recent randomized studies have revealed that both targets are similarly effective in treating the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, but emerging evidence suggests that the globus pallidus may be the preferred target in many patients, based on differences in nonmotor outcomes. Here, we review appropriate patient selection, and the efficacy and safety of DBS therapy in Parkinson's disease. Best outcomes are achieved if the problems of the individual patient are considered when evaluating surgical candidates and considering whether the subthalamic nucleus or the globus pallidus internus should be targeted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 20%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Engineering 7 11%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2012.
All research outputs
#6,494,696
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease
#33
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,982
of 188,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them