↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Expectations of increased and decreased pain explain the effect of conditioned pain modulation in females

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Expectations of increased and decreased pain explain the effect of conditioned pain modulation in females
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, August 2012
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s33559
Pubmed ID
Authors

Espen Bjørkedal, Magne Arve Flaten

Abstract

Chronic pain is believed to be related to a dysfunction of descending pain modulatory mechanisms. Functioning of descending pain modulation can be assessed by various methods, including conditioned pain modulation (CPM). CPM refers to the inhibition of one source of pain by a second noxious stimulus, termed the conditioning stimulus. This procedure can activate an endogenous pain inhibitory mechanism that inhibits early nociceptive processing. Chronic pain and anxiety disorders are more prevalent among females and it has been hypothesized that females react with more negative emotions towards unpleasant stimuli and this might be part of the explanation of greater pain sensitivity in females. The present study investigated whether expectations modulate the effect of conditioning stimulation on pain, subjective stress, and heart rate. In addition, we investigated whether the modulation of CPM by expectations differed between males and females.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,059,820
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#433
of 1,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,005
of 165,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.