↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Teamwork, Professional Identities, Conflict, and Industrial Action in Nigerian Healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Teamwork, Professional Identities, Conflict, and Industrial Action in Nigerian Healthcare
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, October 2020
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s267116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suleiman Mayaki, Martyn Stewart

Abstract

Modern healthcare is delivered by teams of multidisciplinary professionals. Conflicts have been widely reported between these professionals in Nigeria. Furthermore, the health system is frequently crippled by industrial actions by trade unions representing these professionals. This study aimed to shed light on the complexities of factors perceived to cause workplace conflicts, including the extent to which these are thought to link to industrial action. Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were conducted with nurses, doctors, and medical laboratory scientists who work in multiprofessional settings giving a total of 41 participants. Results were analyzed within the framework of the social identity theory. The dominant themes that emerged as barriers to teamwork include professional hierarchy, role ambiguity, and poor communication. At the same time, the health sector leadership and remuneration were the main themes concerning industrial actions. The salience of professional identities was also demonstrated, providing a link between interprofessional conflict in the workplace and competitive industrial actions by trade unions representing health professionals. The implications for educational and clinical practice and the need for interprofessional education are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Lecturer 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 31 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 36 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#12,892,181
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#323
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,917
of 412,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#15
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.