↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The role of epigenetic mechanisms and processes in autoimmune disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Biologics: Targets & Therapy, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 274)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The role of epigenetic mechanisms and processes in autoimmune disorders
Published in
Biologics: Targets & Therapy, September 2012
DOI 10.2147/btt.s24067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith M Greer, Pamela A McCombe

Abstract

The lack of complete concordance of autoimmune disease in identical twins suggests that nongenetic factors play a major role in determining disease susceptibility. In this review, we consider how epigenetic mechanisms could affect the immune system and effector mechanisms in autoimmunity and/or the target organ of autoimmunity and thus affect the development of autoimmune diseases. We also consider the types of stimuli that lead to epigenetic modifications and how these relate to the epidemiology of autoimmune diseases and the biological pathways operative in different autoimmune diseases. Increasing our knowledge of these epigenetic mechanisms and processes will increase the prospects for controlling or preventing autoimmune diseases in the future through the use of drugs that target the epigenetic pathways.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 15%
Chemistry 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,725,691
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#26
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,325
of 188,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them