↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Association Between Active Gait Training for Severely Disabled Patients with Nasogastric Tube Feeding or Gastrostoma and Recovery of Oral Feeding: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Association Between Active Gait Training for Severely Disabled Patients with Nasogastric Tube Feeding or Gastrostoma and Recovery of Oral Feeding: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2020
DOI 10.2147/cia.s270277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideki Arai, Jiro Takeuchi, Masafumi Nozoe, Tatsuyuki Fukuoka, Satoru Matsumoto, Takeshi Morimoto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 15 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Linguistics 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,231,074
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#116
of 1,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,412
of 434,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.