| Title |
Non-invasive imaging of microcirculation: a technology review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/mder.s51426 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sam Eriksson, Jan Nilsson, Christian Sturesson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 14% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 34% |
| Engineering | 33 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 54 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#22,830,981
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#287
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,635
of 369,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.