↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Can We Corroborate Peripapillary RNFL Analysis with Macular GCIPL Analysis? Our 2-Year Experience at a Single-Centre Tertiary Healthcare Hospital Using Two OCT Machines and a Review of Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Can We Corroborate Peripapillary RNFL Analysis with Macular GCIPL Analysis? Our 2-Year Experience at a Single-Centre Tertiary Healthcare Hospital Using Two OCT Machines and a Review of Literature
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2020
DOI 10.2147/opth.s266112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sangeeta Abrol, Sukriti Gupta, Mayuresh Naik, Siddharth Agarwal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Unspecified 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,179,141
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,158
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,608
of 440,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#30
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.