| Title |
Interventions to Improve Adherence to Cardiovascular Medication: What About Gender Differences? A Systematic Literature Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s260562 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcia Vervloet, Joke C Korevaar, Chantal J Leemrijse, John Paget, Leah L Zullig, Liset van Dijk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,140,758
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#162
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,128
of 432,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.