↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Research and Reports in Urology, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy
Published in
Research and Reports in Urology, November 2020
DOI 10.2147/rru.s238823
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guglielmo Mantica, Francesca Ambrosini, Stefano Parodi, Stefano Tappero, Carlo Terrone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 13 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#20,669,023
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Research and Reports in Urology
#194
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#359,763
of 421,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Reports in Urology
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.