↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Parenting style and practices in stepfamilies

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Parenting style and practices in stepfamilies
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, September 2012
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s34966
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynthia Cassoni, Regina HL Caldana

Abstract

There are several studies on the best way to raise a child, ie, what would be the consequences of our actions for our children. We tend to think of how to educate children in a traditional family, but society has undergone many changes and, hence, family structures have undergone changes too. Today, we find a large number of stepfamilies facing the same issues concerning how to educate a child. Stepfamily configuration often entails more than just the addition of a new parent figure. The objective of this study was to shed some light on how these stepfamilies deal with issues of parenting style and practices. We reviewed the Brazilian and international literature concerning parenting styles and practices in stepfamilies. The papers identified were organized and submitted to analysis. We identified very few papers addressing parenting styles and practices, pointing to an important but unaddressed social change as reflected in new family structures. There is a need for longitudinal studies aimed at understanding not only a particular moment in time, but also moments within a context, ie, an analysis with a holistic approach without preconceived ideas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 4%
Czechia 2 4%
Unknown 45 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#13,367,517
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#242
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,086
of 170,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.