↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Simple filter microchip for rapid separation of plasma and viruses from whole blood

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Simple filter microchip for rapid separation of plasma and viruses from whole blood
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s32579
Pubmed ID
Authors

ShuQi Wang, Dusan Sarenac, Michael H Chen, Shih-Han Huang, Francoise F Giguel, Daniel R Kuritzkes, Utkan Demirci

Abstract

Sample preparation is a significant challenge for detection and sensing technologies, since the presence of blood cells can interfere with the accuracy and reliability of virus detection at the nanoscale for point-of-care testing. To the best of our knowledge, there is not an existing on-chip virus isolation technology that does not use complex fluidic pumps. Here, we presented a lab-on-a-chip filter device to isolate plasma and viruses from unprocessed whole blood based on size exclusion without using a micropump. We demonstrated that viruses (eg, HIV) can be separated on a filter-based chip (2-μm pore size) from HIV-spiked whole blood at high recovery efficiencies of 89.9% ± 5.0%, 80.5% ± 4.3%, and 78.2% ± 3.8%, for viral loads of 1000, 10,000 and 100,000 copies/mL, respectively. Meanwhile, 81.7% ± 6.7% of red blood cells and 89.5% ± 2.4% of white blood cells were retained on 2 μm pore-sized filter microchips. We also tested these filter microchips with seven HIV-infected patient samples and observed recovery efficiencies ranging from 73.1% ± 8.3% to 82.5% ± 4.1%. These results are first steps towards developing disposable point-of-care diagnostics and monitoring devices for resource-constrained settings, as well as hospital and primary care settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 179 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 32%
Student > Master 34 19%
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 76 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 12%
Chemistry 13 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 29 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,310,849
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#177
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,664
of 188,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.