| Title |
A single blind randomized control trial on support groups for Chinese persons with mild dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s68687 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel KW Young, Timothy CY Kwok, Petrus YN Ng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 25% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 25 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#818
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,155
of 369,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#27
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.