↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Evaluation of a computer-assisted errorless learning-based memory training program for patients with early Alzheimer’s disease in Hong Kong: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of a computer-assisted errorless learning-based memory training program for patients with early Alzheimer’s disease in Hong Kong: a pilot study
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s45726
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grace Y Lee, Calvin CK Yip, Edwin CS Yu, David WK Man

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 275 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 16%
Student > Bachelor 42 15%
Researcher 36 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 56 20%
Unknown 52 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 72 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Neuroscience 10 4%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 63 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#841
of 1,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,497
of 210,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#18
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.