↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Complicated skin and soft tissue infections: literature review of evidence for and experience with daptomycin

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Complicated skin and soft tissue infections: literature review of evidence for and experience with daptomycin
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, May 2011
DOI 10.2147/idr.s13808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beth White, R Andrew Seaton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 24%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,641,993
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#300
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,106
of 111,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.