| Title |
Irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma: patient selection and perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jhc.s129063 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asha Zimmerman, David Grand, Kevin P Charpentier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 32% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,641,993
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
#32
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,457
of 311,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.