| Title |
A cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line induction and maintenance treatment sequences in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer in France
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ceor.s128371 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaisa Taipale, Katherine B Winfree, Mark Boye, Mickael Basson, Ghassan Sleilaty, James Eaton, Rachel Evans, Christos Chouaid |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,572,103
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#202
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,511
of 327,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.