Title |
What elements of the patient–pharmacist relationship are associated with patient satisfaction?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s35688 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Suliman A AlGhurair, Scot H Simpson, Lisa M Guirguis |
Abstract |
Optimal medication management requires an effective relationship between the patient and health care professional. As pharmacists move from the traditional dispensing role to become more actively involved in patient care, factors influencing their relationship with patients need to be identified. A better understanding of these factors will facilitate more effective relationships. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 170 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
Researcher | 11 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 16% |
Unknown | 50 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 45 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 22% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 10% |
Unknown | 53 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,257,967
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#166
of 1,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,308
of 188,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.