Title |
A comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy between epidural and intravenous analgesia in major spine surgery: a meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s128523 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yichen Meng, Heng Jiang, Chenglin Zhang, Jianquan Zhao, Ce Wang, Rui Gao, Xuhui Zhou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 17% |
Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 60% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Psychology | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,642,184
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#772
of 1,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,774
of 421,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#28
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.