The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Appropriate use of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases: up-to-date indications for primary care providers
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, November 2010
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s14555 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vien X Nguyen, Vi Thuy Le Nguyen, Cuong C Nguyen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
Researcher | 8 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 32 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 35 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#9,054,857
of 26,690,210 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#458
of 1,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,919
of 113,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,690,210 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.