| Title |
Factors influencing the perception of medical staff and outpatients of dual practice in Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s110091 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haiping Chen, Meina Li, Zhixin Dai, Qiangyu Deng, Lulu Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,064
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,535
of 381,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#55
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.