↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Asthma-related emergency department use: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Open access emergency medicine OAEM, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Asthma-related emergency department use: current perspectives
Published in
Open access emergency medicine OAEM, July 2016
DOI 10.2147/oaem.s69973
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurie H Johnson, Patricia Chambers, Judith W Dexheimer

Abstract

Asthma is one of the most common chronic pediatric diseases. Patients with asthma often present to the emergency department for treatment for acute exacerbations. These patients may not have a primary care physician or primary care home, and thus are seeking care in the emergency department. Asthma care in the emergency department is multifaceted to treat asthma patients appropriately and provide quality care. National and international guidelines exist to help drive clinical care. Electronic and paper-based tools exist for both physicians and patients to help improve emergency, home, and preventive care. Treatment of patients with asthma should include the acute exacerbation, long-term management of controller medications, and controlling triggers in the home environment. We will address the current state of asthma research in emergency medicine in the US, and discuss some of the resources being used to help provide a medical home and improve care for patients who suffer from acute asthma exacerbations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 25%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,557,576
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#87
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,957
of 367,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them