↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Acute idiopathic pericarditis: current immunological theories

Overview of attention for article published in Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Acute idiopathic pericarditis: current immunological theories
Published in
Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology, September 2012
DOI 10.2147/rrcc.s20463
Authors

Alida Caforio, Marcolongo, Brucato, Luca Cantarini, Massimo Imazio, Iliceto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 40%
Librarian 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 80%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2012.
All research outputs
#23,100,963
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,712
of 188,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them