| Title |
Effects of Vitamin D on COVID-19 Infection and Prognosis: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/rmhp.s291584 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiwot Yisak, Amien Ewunetei, Belayneh Kefale, Melkalem Mamuye, Fentaw Teshome, Birhanie Ambaw, Getachew Yideg Yitbarek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 208 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 36 | 17% |
| United States | 27 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Canada | 7 | 3% |
| Italy | 4 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 110 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 186 | 89% |
| Scientists | 11 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 250 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 18% |
| Unknown | 112 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 122 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#207,314
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#5
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,008
of 530,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#1
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.