| Title |
A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research and Reports in Urology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/rru.s268596 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Derek J Van Booven, Manish Kuchakulla, Raghav Pai, Fabio S Frech, Reshna Ramasahayam, Pritika Reddy, Madhumita Parmar, Ranjith Ramasamy, Himanshu Arora |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 57 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 9% |
| Engineering | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,256,868
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Research and Reports in Urology
#20
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,887
of 524,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Reports in Urology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.