↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A clinician’s guide to recurrent isolated sleep paralysis

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 3,120)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
39 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
video
7 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
A clinician’s guide to recurrent isolated sleep paralysis
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, July 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s100307
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian A Sharpless

Abstract

This review summarizes the empirical and clinical literature on sleep paralysis most relevant to practitioners. During episodes of sleep paralysis, the sufferer awakens to rapid eye movement sleep-based atonia combined with conscious awareness. This is usually a frightening event often accompanied by vivid, waking dreams (ie, hallucinations). When sleep paralysis occurs independently of narcolepsy and other medical conditions, it is termed "isolated" sleep paralysis. Although the more specific diagnostic syndrome of "recurrent isolated sleep paralysis" is a recognized sleep-wake disorder, it is not widely known to nonsleep specialists. This is likely due to the unusual nature of the condition, patient reluctance to disclose episodes for fear of embarrassment, and a lack of training during medical residencies and graduate education. In fact, a growing literature base has accrued on the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical impact of this condition, and a number of assessment instruments are currently available in both self-report and interview formats. After discussing these and providing suggestions for accurate diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and patient selection, the available treatment options are discussed. These consist of both pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions which, although promising, require more empirical support and larger, well-controlled trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 18%
Other 18 11%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 53 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 23%
Psychology 27 16%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 64 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 331. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#101,205
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#13
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,091
of 367,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.