The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Bone repair by periodontal ligament stem cell-seeded nanohydroxyapatite-chitosan scaffold
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s36714 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shaohua Ge, Ning Zhao, Lu Wang, Meijiao Yu, Hong Liu, Aimei Song, Jing Huang, Guancong Wang, Pishan Yang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,077
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,220
of 190,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#22
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.