| Title |
Optimal management for people with severe spasticity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/dnnd.s16630 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey S Shilt, Pennie S Seibert, Vivek Kadyan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 25% |
| Researcher | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 20% |
| Engineering | 2 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,169,675
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease
#78
of 84 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,075
of 172,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.