↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Observational evaluation of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics in 117 Brazilian women without uterine prolapse undergoing vaginal hysterectomy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Observational evaluation of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics in 117 Brazilian women without uterine prolapse undergoing vaginal hysterectomy
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, September 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s35927
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Sergio Batista, Takasi Osako, Eliana Mara Clemente, Fernanda Carvalhido Antonio Batista, Maurício Takeshi Janiques Osako

Abstract

Despite the introduction of minimally invasive approaches for various benign uterine problems, hysterectomy is often still performed abdominally, but the vaginal route should be used whenever possible. The aim of this study was to identify the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics of women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy in the absence of uterine prolapse.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,169,675
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#670
of 762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,332
of 170,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.