↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Efficacy of autologous platelets in macular hole surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of autologous platelets in macular hole surgery
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s44440
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aristeidis Konstantinidis, Mark Hero, Panagiotis Nanos, Georgios D Panos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 28%
Other 4 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#820
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,448
of 212,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#7
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.