| Title |
Association of the BANK1 R61H variant with systemic lupus erythematosus in Americans of European and African ancestry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Application of Clinical Genetics, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tacg.s4089 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Struan FA Grant, Michelle Petri, Jonathan P Bradfield, Cecilia E Kim, Erin Santa, Kiran Annaiah, Edward C Frackelton, Joseph T Glessner, F George Otieno, Julie L Shaner, Ryan M Smith, Andrew W Eckert, Rosetta M Chiavacci, Marcin Imielinski, Kathleen E Sullivan, Hakon Hakonarson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,554,709
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Application of Clinical Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,501
of 181,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Application of Clinical Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them