↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS): Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version for Chronic Low Back Pain and Knee Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS): Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version for Chronic Low Back Pain and Knee Pain
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, February 2021
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s287549
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasuhiro Nagasawa, Ai Shibata, Hanako Fukamachi, Kaori Ishii, Rikard K Wicksell, Koichiro Oka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 12 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,572
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#406,301
of 531,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#46
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.