| Title |
Evaluation of a prototype electronic personal health record for patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s36320 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent Chiche, Alessandra Brescianini, Julien Mancini, Hervé Servy, Jean-Marc Durand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 30% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,278,028
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#704
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,125
of 190,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.