↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Imaging late capsular bag distension syndrome: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Imaging late capsular bag distension syndrome: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2012
DOI 10.2147/opth.s34639
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yar Li Tan, Lakshmanasamudram Sethuraman Mohanram, Seng Ei Ti, Tin Aung, Shamira Perera

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 77%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,368,294
of 16,793,177 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#435
of 2,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,235
of 161,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,793,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,393 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them