| Title |
Biocompatibility of Fe3O4@Au composite magnetic nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s24596 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuntao Li, Jing Liu, Yuejiao Zhong, Jia Zhang, Ziyu Wang, Li Wang, Yanli An, Mei Lin, Zhiqiang Gao, Dongsheng Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 12 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,077
of 4,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,341
of 153,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#21
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.