| Title |
A scalable fabrication process of polymer microneedles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s28511 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sixing Yang, Yan Feng, Lijun Zhang, Nixiang Chen, Weien Yuan, Tuo Jin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 36 | 21% |
| Engineering | 21 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,863,558
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#135
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,842
of 168,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.