Title |
High expression of ALDOA and DDX5 are associated with poor prognosis in human colorectal cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Management and Research, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/cmar.s157925 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ling Dai, Guangdong Pan, Xiaojia Liu, Jiang Huang, Zhiqing Jiang, Xiaobao Zhu, Xinli Gan, Qing Xu, Ning Tan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 25% |
Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 44% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,645,091
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#352
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,775
of 330,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#15
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.