| Title |
Comparison between automated and manual measurements of carotid intima-media thickness in clinical practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vascular Health and Risk Management, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2147/vhrm.s5745 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cláudia Maria Vilas Freire, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Felipe Batista Lima Barbosa, Anelise Impelisiere Nogueira, Maria Cristina Costa de Almeida, Márcia Melo Barbosa, Ângela Maria Quintão Lana, Ana Cristina Simões e Silva, Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#316
of 815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,309
of 106,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.