| Title |
Development of a non-settling gel formulation of 0.5% loteprednol etabonate for anti-inflammatory use as an ophthalmic drop
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s40588 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Westra, Coffey, Heleen H. DeCory, Stephen Lane |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 39% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#491
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,627
of 291,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#5
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.