The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Update of research on the role of EZH2 in cancer progression
|
---|---|
Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/ott.s42453 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Liang Shen, Jing Cui, Shumei Liang, Yingxin Pang, Peishu Liu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 26% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 14% |
Researcher | 6 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 44% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
Chemistry | 4 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,738,892
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#564
of 3,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,224
of 214,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.