↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Optimal Management of Hereditary Angioedema: Shared Decision-Making

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asthma and Allergy, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Optimal Management of Hereditary Angioedema: Shared Decision-Making
Published in
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, February 2021
DOI 10.2147/jaa.s284029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleena Banerji, John Anderson, Douglas T Johnston

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Unknown 9 69%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Design 1 8%
Unknown 10 77%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#17,438,425
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#371
of 536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,313
of 531,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#16
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.