Title |
Effective screen for amyloid β aggregation inhibitor using amyloid β-conjugated gold nanoparticles
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s15278 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sun-Ho Han, Yu Jin Chang, Eun Sun Jung, Jong-Won Kim, Duk Lyul Na, Inhee Mook-Jung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 4% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 43 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 34% |
Researcher | 10 | 21% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 23% |
Chemistry | 10 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,077
of 4,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,624
of 190,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.