RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @adamhfinn: Already widely reported but definitely worth a look if you haven’t seen it already. This is the most effective tool we have…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
RT @chrischirp: 11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning…
11. We should demand no less tranparency from JCVI. Instead, we had (and still have) high profile members of JCVI warning of vaccine risks but *not* covid risks and wrongly downplaying importance of vax in reducing transmission https://t.co/Nce2vC6Aw6 ht
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @profbuchan: Recalibrating lateral flow performance stats from clinical to public health testing in #COVID19 https://t.co/myvcCZgTeX @i_…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @livuniHLS: Lateral flow tests detect most people at risk of transmitting Covid-19. A new formula shows that lateral flow tests (LFTs) a…
RT @livuniHLS: Lateral flow tests detect most people at risk of transmitting Covid-19. A new formula shows that lateral flow tests (LFTs) a…
RT @profbuchan: Recalibrating lateral flow performance stats from clinical to public health testing in #COVID19 https://t.co/myvcCZgTeX @i_…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @IngeBonneux: @TijlDeBie @demorgen Welke is de wetenschappelijk onderbouwde reden voor het invoeren van deze maatregel? Het voorlopige a…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @HZiauddeen: From a JCVI member, this is pretty much misinformation. Vaccinating kids, mandating masks, focusing on reducing airborne t…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @HZiauddeen: From a JCVI member, this is pretty much misinformation. Vaccinating kids, mandating masks, focusing on reducing airborne t…
RT @livuniHLS: Lateral flow tests detect most people at risk of transmitting Covid-19. A new formula shows that lateral flow tests (LFTs) a…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @adamhfinn: Already widely reported but definitely worth a look if you haven’t seen it already. This is the most effective tool we have…
RT @HZiauddeen: From a JCVI member, this is pretty much misinformation. Vaccinating kids, mandating masks, focusing on reducing airborne t…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…