148 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
So far, Altmetric has seen
420 X posts from 359 X users, with an upper bound of 1,782,656 followers.
Showing items 301–400
2,640 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
9,981 followers
RT @HZiauddeen: From a JCVI member, this is pretty much misinformation. Vaccinating kids, mandating masks, focusing on reducing airborne t…
1,252 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
9,981 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
4,827 followers
Lateral flow tests detect most people at risk of transmitting Covid-19. A new formula shows that lateral flow tests (LFTs) are more than 80% effective at detecting any level of Covid-19 finds a new paper involving University of Liverpool researchers https:
153 followers
RT @HZiauddeen: From a JCVI member, this is pretty much misinformation. Vaccinating kids, mandating masks, focusing on reducing airborne t…
3,322 followers
Lateral flow tests detect most people at risk of transmitting Covid-19. A new formula shows that lateral flow tests (LFTs) are more than 80% effective at detecting any level of Covid-19 finds a new paper involving University of Liverpool researchers https:
575 followers
@Robspiked @cjsnowdon In that age group, yes. In addition to the mitigations (NPI) point, the very high infection levels in the under 16s as compared with the 16s and over in schools also confirms that vaccines significantly cut infections, contrary to thi
330 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
13,320 followers
RT @profbuchan: Recalibrating lateral flow performance stats from clinical to public health testing in #COVID19 https://t.co/myvcCZgTeX @i_…
2,711 followers
RT @profbuchan: Recalibrating lateral flow performance stats from clinical to public health testing in #COVID19 https://t.co/myvcCZgTeX @i_…
4,031 followers
Recalibrating lateral flow performance stats from clinical to public health testing in #COVID19 https://t.co/myvcCZgTeX @i_petersen @michaelmina_lab @TheStatsGeek @ScienceShared. A useful technology when embedded in clearly communicated and locally owned #
129 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
3,661 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
706 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
50 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
187 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
1,155 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
2,782 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
374 followers
How is this guy a member of the JCVI?
300 followers
@KathyConWom Because they're pretty accurate. https://t.co/fQAwhRp68f
374 followers
RT @HZiauddeen: From a JCVI member, this is pretty much misinformation. Vaccinating kids, mandating masks, focusing on reducing airborne t…
374 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
1,572 followers
RT @drmcdonnellygm1: No, vaccines do reduce transmission, they just don't eliminate it. Infectious diseases are brought under control with…
9,365 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
443 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
197 followers
RT @drmcdonnellygm1: No, vaccines do reduce transmission, they just don't eliminate it. Infectious diseases are brought under control with…
7,353 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
17 followers
RT @adamhfinn: Already widely reported but definitely worth a look if you haven’t seen it already. This is the most effective tool we have…
7,059 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
427 followers
No, vaccines do reduce transmission, they just don't eliminate it. Infectious diseases are brought under control with a bundle of measures that work together. This includes vaccines, masks, ventilation, case finding, isolation, contact tracing. All are imp
518 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
137 followers
@Pharmafocus Also it appears its been peer reviewed and the individual is anonymous 🤔https://t.co/4o0cSxXfzH
1,552 followers
RT @adamhfinn: Already widely reported but definitely worth a look if you haven’t seen it already. This is the most effective tool we have…
1,196 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
4,880 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
28,709 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
1,171 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
535 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
464 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
70 followers
No wonder JCVI dragged their heels on deciding to vaccinate household members of the immunosuppressed.
417 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
361 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
213 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
5,339 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
400 followers
RT @HZiauddeen: From a JCVI member, this is pretty much misinformation. Vaccinating kids, mandating masks, focusing on reducing airborne t…
400 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
526 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
4,921 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
11,317 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
2,818 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
3,796 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
558 followers
Another so-called doctor that the GMC should be investigating.
18,626 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
46,117 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
19,259 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
19,259 followers
RT @HZiauddeen: From a JCVI member, this is pretty much misinformation. Vaccinating kids, mandating masks, focusing on reducing airborne t…
1,320 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
383 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
192 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
156 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
10,289 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
1,355 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
775 followers
@SGriffin_Lab JCVI 👇🤯 https://t.co/fN9gToWrdp
32 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
3,037 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
1,374 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
297 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
151 followers
@jimalkhalili I eventually got around to reading your terrific @theipaper article from last week yesterday morning & then this ⬇️. Weird eh?
3,411 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
5,200 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
774 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
2,415 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
5,884 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
1,565 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
1,298 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
2,818 followers
RT @HZiauddeen: From a JCVI member, this is pretty much misinformation. Vaccinating kids, mandating masks, focusing on reducing airborne t…
270 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
1,652 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
1,388 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
3,540 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
47,516 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
6,697 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
3,300 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
2,495 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
3,227 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
1,174 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
1,116 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
1,424 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
939 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
999 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
6,069 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
2,149 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
6,325 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
3,258 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
3,257 followers
RT @HZiauddeen: From a JCVI member, this is pretty much misinformation. Vaccinating kids, mandating masks, focusing on reducing airborne t…
2,162 followers
RT @dgurdasani1: No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protecti…
141,541 followers
No. A single intervention that reduces *infection* and transmission by 70%-80% is *highly effective*, even if the protection wanes over time. How can someone in JCVI say vaccines reduce transmission 'poorly'? Vaccines + mitigations are the most effective t
3,697 followers
RT @HZiauddeen: From a JCVI member, this is pretty much misinformation. Vaccinating kids, mandating masks, focusing on reducing airborne t…
Showing items 301–400