The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Instruments to assess patient satisfaction after teleconsultation and triage: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s56160 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martina Allemann Iseli, Regina Kunz, Eva Blozik |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 20% |
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2014.
All research outputs
#8,267,700
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#588
of 1,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,422
of 241,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#19
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.