↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effects of 16-week high-intensity interval training using upper and lower body ergometers on aerobic fitness and morphological changes in healthy men: a preliminary study

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 260)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Effects of 16-week high-intensity interval training using upper and lower body ergometers on aerobic fitness and morphological changes in healthy men: a preliminary study
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, November 2014
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s68932
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yusuke Osawa, Koichiro Azuma, Shogo Tabata, Fuminori Katsukawa, Hiroyuki Ishida, Yuko Oguma, Toshihide Kawai, Hiroshi Itoh, Shigeo Okuda, Hideo Matsumoto

Abstract

It is unclear whether combined leg and arm high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improves fitness and morphological characteristics equal to those of leg-based HIIT programs. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of HIIT using leg-cycling (LC) and arm-cranking (AC) ergometers with an HIIT program using only LC. Effects on aerobic capacity and skeletal muscle were analyzed. Twelve healthy male subjects were assigned into two groups. One performed LC-HIIT (n=7) and the other LC- and AC-HIIT (n=5) twice weekly for 16 weeks. The training programs consisted of eight to 12 sets of >90% VO2 (the oxygen uptake that can be utilized in one minute) peak for 60 seconds with a 60-second active rest period. VO2 peak, watt peak, and heart rate were measured during an LC incremental exercise test. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of trunk and thigh muscles as well as bone-free lean body mass were measured using magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The watt peak increased from baseline in both the LC (23%±38%; P<0.05) and the LC-AC groups (11%±9%; P<0.05). The CSA of the quadriceps femoris muscles also increased from baseline in both the LC (11%±4%; P<0.05) and the LC-AC groups (5%±5%; P<0.05). In contrast, increases were observed in the CSA of musculus psoas major (9%±11%) and musculus anterolateral abdominal (7%±4%) only in the LC-AC group. These results suggest that a combined LC- and AC-HIIT program improves aerobic capacity and muscle hypertrophy in both leg and trunk muscles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
France 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Other 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 61 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 30 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,541,232
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#38
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,382
of 277,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them