| Title |
Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jmdh.s155103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yanling Jin, Nitika Sanger, Ieta Shams, Candice Luo, Hamnah Shahid, Guowei Li, Meha Bhatt, Laura Zielinski, Bianca Bantoto, Mei Wang, Luciana PF Abbade, Ikunna Nwosu, Alvin Leenus, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Muhammad Maaz, Yaping Chang, Guangwen Sun, Mitchell AH Levine, Jonathan D Adachi, Lehana Thabane, Zainab Samaan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,221,240
of 23,588,018 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#160
of 862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,091
of 336,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,588,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.