RT @UHCW_CEBIS: https://t.co/UDgD0FOY6i “We found that 87.9% of the included studies reported suboptimal adherence to reporting guidelines”

RT @UHCW_CEBIS: https://t.co/UDgD0FOY6i “We found that 87.9% of the included studies reported suboptimal adherence to reporting guidelines”

@annemscheel @clari_carneiro Jin an colleagues, conducted a systematic review of adherence to guideline studies and found that JIF is, amongst others, associated with better reporting: https://t.co/p2kfOpIiB6

RT @KSR_SysRev: We've had #research reporting guidelines for 21 years - so why do >85% of studies (from a test cohort of n=124) only subopt…

We've had #research reporting guidelines for 21 years - so why do >85% of studies (from a test cohort of n=124) only suboptimally adhere to them? https://t.co/gyLqzpSzQX via @DovePress @HEI_mcmaster @McMasterU #OA H/T @CONSORTing @EQUATORNetwork @PRISMA

Most published medical studies have suboptimal adherence to reporting guidelines. https://t.co/RNjLQRCY7H

adherence to reporting guidelines remains suboptimal - Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an up... - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/1QHEovxveI

RT @dermatologyf: Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systemati…

RT @dermatologyf: Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systemati…

Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an update. https://t.co/QSSFcSFmXr

Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A ... - Dove Medical Press https://t.co/2ytu1YjGhj

Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A ... - Dove Medical Press https://t.co/AwLCFdnpJb